TOOL 02 · REPORT · SCORECARD

Your baseline, read back as a report

Every run you logged in the Baseline Kit — scored per platform, grouped by topic, ranked against whoever got named instead, and turned into a fix list. Nothing is fetched and nothing is sent. This page only reads what is already in your browser.

SAMPLE · Eggleston Office · locked 2026-09-19 100 buyer questions · 7 engines · 3 passes · every figure measured

A filled report, so you can see what yours will look like

This is the locked baseline of Eggleston Office, an office furniture dealer in Dallas–Fort Worth, the founder’s family business, and Command Module’s own first customer: 100 buyer questions put to seven engines, three passes over, locked on 2026-09-19. Every figure is measured. Nothing is projected, and nothing is blended. Your own runs replace this section the moment you log one.

Per-engine visibility

Pass one of three. Each bar divides by the answers that engine gave: a question it had no answer to, or a leg that did not run, is counted beside the bar and kept out of it.

ChatGPT 20%20 of 100 answered
Claude 0%0 of 92 answered · a floor
Perplexity 10%10 of 100 answered
Gemini 10%10 of 100 answered
Grok 21%21 of 100 answered
Google AI Overviews 2.9%2 of 70 answered
Google AI Mode 2%2 of 100 answered
A blended score would say 9.4%

9.4% is the average of those bars and it describes none of them. Per engine, always: the same rule this page applies to your own runs.

ChatGPT

20%

Named in 20 of 100 answers.

Named first
14 of 20
Link rate
95% 19 of 20
Named again
41.9% 26 of 62
Same verdict
82% 164 of 200

Method · OpenAI Responses API (gpt-5, low reasoning, 3 searches max), web search on

Claude

0%

Named in 0 of 92 answers (a floor: answers measured before 2 October 2026 were cut short). Of its 100 questions, 3 drew no answer to judge and 5 did not run; neither counts.

Named first
—
Link rate
—
Named again
—
Same verdict
—

Never named on this engine in pass one, so first place, link rate and named again have no denominator. Same verdict would only count the passes agreeing on a miss. Each reads “—”.

Method · Anthropic API (claude-sonnet-5, 2 searches max), web search on

Perplexity

10%

Named in 10 of 100 answers.

Named first
6 of 10
Link rate
0% 0 of 10
Named again
53.6% 15 of 28
Same verdict
93.5% 187 of 200

Method · Perplexity Agent API (sonar), web search on

Gemini

10%

Named in 10 of 100 answers.

Named first
6 of 10
Link rate
Not recordedread and cited kept together
Named again
51.9% 14 of 27
Same verdict
93.5% 187 of 200

Link rate leaves out all 10 answers that named the business. This engine listed the pages it read in the same list as the ones it cited, and this pass was run before the two were kept apart, so whether those answers linked the site cannot be told.

Method · Google AI API, search grounding on

Grok

21%

Named in 21 of 100 answers.

Named first
14 of 21
Link rate
90.5% 19 of 21
Named again
66% 33 of 50
Same verdict
91.5% 183 of 200

Method · xAI Responses API (grok-4.3), web search on

Google AI Overviews

2.9%

Named in 2 of 70 answers. Of its 100 questions, 30 drew no answer to judge; neither counts.

Named first
2 of 2
Link rate
0% 0 of 2
Named again
100% 3 of 3
Same verdict
100% 115 of 115

Every rate on this card divides by 2, so read each one as a count.

Method · SerpApi capture of Google AI Overviews (Google has no API) — text blocks + sources; the names on Google's cards arrive as source titles

Google AI Mode

2%

Named in 2 of 100 answers.

Named first
2 of 2
Link rate
Not readablecards link via Google
Named again
100% 4 of 4
Same verdict
100% 200 of 200

Every rate on this card divides by 2, so read each one as a count.

Method · SerpApi capture of Google AI Mode (Google has no API) — text + the cards it showed; card links route through Google, so Link Rate is not measurable here

Each square is one question, in order: lit when named, dark when missed, outlined when the engine gave no answer to judge, dashed when the leg did not run.

Three passes, and two ways to read them. Named again is the one to trust: passes two and three are each compared with pass one, answer by answer, and of the 174 pairs where either answer named Eggleston, 95 named it in both (54.6%). Same verdict counts a question missed in both passes as agreement, which is most of a grid at these rates, so it reads high (93.6% of 1228 comparable answers).
How each engine was asked. Each engine is asked through its official API with web search on, and the two Google surfaces are captured through SerpApi because Google has no API. An API answer stands in for the app a buyer uses and can answer differently. This run carries no tone judge and no count of every brand named, so recommendation rate and crowding are left off these cards until a run measures them.

Who gets named instead

The five tracked DFW dealers, counted across the 662 answers in pass one. Eggleston finishes fifth of five on a 10.3% share of voice: 65 of the 631 times any of the five was named.

01 Dallas Desk 235of 662
02 Continental Office Group 151of 662
03 Office Modular Concepts 105of 662
04 OFCO 75of 662
05 Eggleston Office The client 65of 662

Questions lost on every engine

62 of 100 questions named Eggleston on none of the engines that answered them in pass one. Every question here is graded winnable: Eggleston could truthfully be the answer. The ten below drew the most tracked dealers. Claude’s answers were measured before 2 October 2026 and cut off part way, so a question here may have named Eggleston further down.

Best office furniture dealers in Dallas Fort Worthlocal · winnable · missed on 6 of 7 engines · no answer on Google AI Overviews Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Who are the alternatives to Office Modular Concepts in Dallas?who · winnable · missed on 7 of 7 engines Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Best office furniture dealer in Dallas-Fort Worthlocal · winnable · missed on 6 of 7 engines · no answer on Google AI Overviews Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Top office furniture dealer companies in Dallas-Fort Worthlocal · winnable · missed on 7 of 7 engines Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Office furniture dealer near me in Dallas-Fort Worthlocal · winnable · missed on 7 of 7 engines Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Recommended office furniture dealer in Dallas-Fort Worthlocal · winnable · missed on 7 of 7 engines Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Used office furniture in Dallas-Fort Worthservice · winnable · missed on 6 of 7 engines · no answer on Google AI Overviews Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Who does used office furniture in Dallas-Fort Worth?service · winnable · missed on 6 of 7 engines · no answer on Google AI Overviews Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Used office furniture services near Dallas-Fort Worthservice · winnable · missed on 6 of 7 engines · no answer on Google AI Overviews Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group
Who does office cubicles in Dallas-Fort Worth?service · winnable · missed on 7 of 7 engines Office Modular Concepts, Dallas Desk, OFCO, Continental Office Group

+ 52 more in the raw sample JSON

Where the engines look

Share is a kind of site’s cut of every source listed, so the column adds to 100. Coverage is how many of the 575 answers that listed a source listed that kind at least once, so it can add past 100. A listed source is a page the engine read or cited.

01 Competitors’ own sites33 sites · in 90.3% of answers 54.9%2641 cites
02 Everything else607 sites · in 81.2% of answers 34.8%1673 cites
03 Directories and marketplaces18 sites · in 26.8% of answers 4.4%212 cites
04 Community and social6 sites · in 20.0% of answers 2.6%126 cites
05 Manufacturers and brands2 sites · in 8.3% of answers 1.2%59 cites
06 Government and education24 sites · in 6.4% of answers 1.0%48 cites
07 Your own pages1 site · in 8.3% of answers 1.0%48 cites

Visibility by topic

Pass one, each topic over the answers it drew across the seven engines, lowest first.

01 longtail4 questions · 27 answers 0 of 270%
02 choose6 questions · 42 answers 1 of 422.4%
03 cost12 questions · 77 answers 2 of 772.6%
04 manufacturer6 questions · 40 answers 2 of 405%
05 service24 questions · 160 answers 10 of 1606.3%
06 alternative3 questions · 21 answers 2 of 219.5%
07 who10 questions · 69 answers 7 of 6910.1%
08 used5 questions · 31 answers 4 of 3112.9%
09 vertical5 questions · 33 answers 5 of 3315.2%
10 local22 questions · 142 answers 28 of 14219.7%
11 pain3 questions · 20 answers 4 of 2020%

Where this came from. eggleston-audit/baselines/baseline-20260919-153713.json, schema 2, locked 2026-09-19, append-only and hashed, read with its three pass files. Pass one ran 2026-09-18. Read the raw JSON and check every number on this page against it.

WHAT THIS IS NOT

It will not tell you a number it did not measure

If you logged eleven runs, it reports eleven runs. It will not estimate the two engines you skipped, it will not project a score for an engine with no logged-out page, and it will not blur a fabricated figure behind a paywall and call it a preview. Every number on this page traces to a row you ticked yourself — which is also why the honest answer is sometimes "not enough runs yet."

That last one is the catch, and it is worth saying plainly: the thin part of a DIY baseline is the run count. The method here is the one we sell, unchanged. But 100 questions across seven engines is 700 runs before you repeat anything, and a second and third pass takes it to 2,100 — and three passes is the smallest number that separates "the engine doesn't know us" from "that one was a fluke." Almost nobody gets past the first pass by hand, which is the only reason the rung below exists.

OR THE MONTHLY PLAN — $199 BACK TO ALL TOOLS

The $149 is credited in full against your first month if you start the loop within 30 days of delivery. It buys the full measurement, run for you: 100 questions, seven engines, three passes and a locked record. Everything else this page renders is free, from runs you log yourself.

NEXT AI READABILITY CHECK → checks whether the AI crawlers can read your site.